Katch-Mcardle Formula For BMR & TDEE

Spread the love

Katch-McArdle Calculator

Required for body fat estimation methods (if needed)
Your current body weight
Your height (for body fat estimation if needed)
Age in years (for body fat estimation if needed)
Choose how you want to provide body composition data
Select your typical weekly activity level for TDEE calculation

Katch-McArdle Equation

The Katch-McArdle equation was developed by Frank Katch and William McArdle in 1975, specifically designed to overcome the limitations of traditional BMR equations that rely solely on body weight. Research validation studies demonstrate superior accuracy in athletic populations, showing correlation coefficients of 0.85-0.92 with indirect calorimetry.

Lean Body Mass Focus

Unlike Harris-Benedict or Mifflin-St Jeor equations, Katch-McArdle exclusively uses lean body mass (LBM) as the primary variable. ScienceDirect research confirms that muscle tissue is metabolically active, burning 13-15 calories per pound per day at rest, making LBM the most accurate predictor of metabolic rate.

Athletic Population Accuracy

Clinical studies show that Katch-McArdle provides ±5-8% accuracy in athletes and bodybuilders, compared to ±12-15% for traditional equations. This superior precision makes it the gold standard for individuals with low body fat percentages and high muscle mass.

Body Composition Requirements

The equation requires accurate body composition data (body fat percentage or lean body mass) for optimal results. NCBI research indicates that DEXA scans, hydrostatic weighing, or BodPod measurements provide the most reliable body composition data for Katch-McArdle calculations.

Katch-McArdle Equation Formulas

Katch-McArdle BMR Equation
Primary Formula:
BMR = 370 + (21.6 × Lean Body Mass in kg)
Alternative Formula (Imperial):
BMR = 370 + (9.8 × Lean Body Mass in lbs)
Most accurate for individuals with body fat percentage below 20% (men) or 30% (women)
Lean Body Mass Calculation Methods
From Body Fat Percentage:
LBM = Total Weight × (1 – Body Fat %/100)
Boer Formula (Estimation – Men):
LBM = (0.407 × Weight kg) + (0.267 × Height cm) – 19.2
Boer Formula (Estimation – Women):
LBM = (0.252 × Weight kg) + (0.473 × Height cm) – 48.3
Direct body composition measurement preferred over estimation formulas
TDEE Calculation
Total Daily Energy Expenditure:
TDEE = Katch-McArdle BMR × Activity Factor
Activity factors: 1.2 (sedentary) to 1.9 (extremely active)

Body Composition Standards & Classifications

Category Men (Body Fat %) Women (Body Fat %) Katch-McArdle Accuracy Recommended Use
Essential Fat 2-5% 10-13% Excellent (±3-5%) Elite athletes, bodybuilders
Athletic 6-13% 14-20% Excellent (±5-7%) Competitive athletes, fitness enthusiasts
Fitness 14-17% 21-24% Very Good (±7-10%) Active individuals, recreational athletes
Average 18-24% 25-31% Good (±10-12%) General population with known body composition
Above Average 25%+ 32%+ Fair (±12-15%) Consider Harris-Benedict or Mifflin-St Jeor instead

Note: Katch-McArdle accuracy decreases significantly in individuals with higher body fat percentages. For optimal results, body composition should be measured using DEXA, hydrostatic weighing, or air displacement plethysmography.

Katch-McArdle vs. Other BMR Equations

Equation Primary Variables Best For Accuracy Range Limitations
Katch-McArdle Lean Body Mass Athletes, low body fat ±5-8% (athletic populations) Requires body composition data
Harris-Benedict Age, gender, weight, height General population ±10-15% (average populations) Overestimates in obese individuals
Mifflin-St Jeor Age, gender, weight, height Overweight/obese individuals ±10-12% (general populations) Less accurate for athletes
Cunningham Lean Body Mass Very lean athletes ±5-7% (very low body fat) Only for body fat <10% (men), <16% (women)

Related Tools

Calories Burned Rowing Machine
Calories Burned during Sleep Calculator
Protein Intake Calculator
Fat Intake Calculator
Glycemic Load & Index Calculator
Creatine Intake Calculator
Carbohydrate Intake Calculator
Exercise Calories Calculator
Running Calories Burned Calculator
Cycling Calorie Calculator
Walking Calorie Burn Calculator
Calories to Grams Calculator

References

  • Nösslinger, H., Mair, E., Toplak, H., & Hörmann-Wallner, M. (2021). Underestimation of resting metabolic rate using equations compared to indirect calorimetry in normal-weight subjects: Consideration of resting metabolic rate as a function of body composition. Clinical Nutrition Open Science, 35, 48-66.
  • Bi X, Forde CG, Goh AT, Henry CJ. Basal Metabolic Rate and Body Composition Predict Habitual Food and Macronutrient Intakes: Gender Differences. Nutrients. 2019 Nov 4;11(11):2653. doi: 10.3390/nu11112653. PMID: 31689964; PMCID: PMC6893862.
  • Verma, N., Kumar, S.S. & Suresh, A. An evaluation of basal metabolic rate among healthy individuals — a cross-sectional study. Bull Fac Phys Ther 28, 26 (2023).
  • Lawrence, C. B. (2014). The Contribution of Raised Metabolic Rate in the Weight Loss Associated with Alzheimer’s Disease. Diet and Nutrition in Dementia and Cognitive Decline, 479-486.

Author

  • Manish Kumar

    Manish is a NASM-certified fitness and nutrition coach with over 10 years of experience in weight lifting and fat loss fitness coaching. He specializes in gym-based training and has a lot of knowledge about exercise, lifting technique, biomechanics, and more. Through “Fit Health Regimen,” he generously shares the insights he’s gained over a decade in the field. His goal is to equip others with the knowledge to start their own fitness journey.

Leave a Comment